Who’s in the movie? How are the reviews? It’s
what you ask before selecting a movie. We did that. 85% on Rotten Tomatoes…starring Brad Pitt and
Leonardo DiCaprio…and directed by Quentin Tarantino.
It should have been great.
But I want my three hours back…
It’s not the first time that my taste has
differed from that of the Hollywood critics. I didn’t think much of The Shape of Water, and
that had 13 nominations and won four Oscars in 2018. While cinematically
lovely, The Shape of Water struck me as an otherworldly version of Beauty
and the Beast. Benign enough, but slow and tedious.
Then there’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,
the latest movie from director Quentin Tarantino and starring “Leo” and “Brad.”
Incredible acting. Interesting direction and cinematography. I’m sure those in
the know would commend the filmmakers for the set design, costumes and
technical tricks that so effectively separated “real life” from the television
and movie clips of DiCaprio’s struggling character’s career.
But here’s my problem: The movie was a nearly three-hour meander through anger and emotional
pain that ends with no evolution and no resolution. And it wasn’t just one
plot—several subplots crisscrossed in their own violent and miserable way. The
characters didn’t grow…and the good guys did not win over the bad (not that
good always triumphs over evil). In the end, several people were dead and
everyone else was as miserable as
he or she was at the start of the movie. DeCaprio’s aging character was
still emotionally distraught about his flagging career.
Brad Pitt was still the
man who allegedly killed his wife, but that was never proved. And the
drug-addicted, angry, soulless “Charles Manson cult members” were merely inexplicably
evil.
What a sad commentary on humanity.
I go
to the movies for three reasons—to feel good/be inspired…to escape from the
stresses of everyday life…or to be mentally challenged or have my world view
expanded. I’m not against movies that have violence or that are about “bad”
things. But I am against gratuitous violence for the sake of violence. What was
so deeply troublesome about this movie was that it exalted the misery in each
of the subplots, but it provided no growth or solution for the characters. It
was an extended experiment in cognitive dissonance as the misery barreled on,
and I kept hoping for a path to resolution.
I must acknowledge that there was one moment
of clarity in the midst of the film’s chaos. As the Manson team is preparing to
enter a home and commit grisly murders, their courage seemed to flag after one
of the four chickened out and ran off. I don’t remember the exact quote, but
one of the remaining women went on a brief tirade blaming Hollywood for the
emotional problems of young people—Hollywood makes television and films that
are violent and celebrate killing, hence the Manson crew should “get back at
Hollywood” for turning them into angry psychological messes by killing the
people living in the Hollywood Hills home.
Aha!! That was something I wholeheartedly
agree with—at last a moment of clarity.
I flipped through the news this past weekend
to learn about an accused sex trafficker who has supposedly committed suicide…continued
calls for stricter gun laws after the two latest mass shootings…a cache of fentanyl that was found at the border…and the latest number of deaths attributed to the
opioid crisis.
I
don’t know if life imitates art or art imitates life, but I do know that the
same Hollywood stars who righteously stand on their soapboxes about gun
violence, drug epidemics, disrespect for women and the demise of the family are
the same ones starring in or producing television programs and movies that
celebrate gun violence and explosives (pick any James Bond or Mission
Impossible movie…and those are the tame ones)…the drug culture (how many
people were “addicted” to the TV show Breaking Bad?)…gratuitous sexual
encounters (we’ve all heard about 50 Shades of Grey, but what about
something as “benign” as the TV show The Bachelorette or the movie Friends
with Benefits) and the endless stream of shows about dysfunctional families
with absent fathers and overwhelmed single mothers?
Wild was the hit
book and movie of 2013/2014. My daughter had to read it for a summer assignment
in high school and hated every word. Why? Because she had to suffer through
endless pages of the main character’s drug and sexual escapades as she dealt
with the emotional pain of the loss of her mother. Yes,
eventually the lead character “found herself”…but not before she drugged and
slept her way through a series of dangerous encounters.
Even sweet Rory from The Gilmore Girls,
the smartest girl in the high school class and destined for greatness, ends the
mini-series revival pregnant and unmarried. Rory is who every girl of the early
2000s wanted to be, and yet even she “accidentally” got pregnant and was planning
on raising her child without a father.
I am not suggesting that we all become
Pollyannas and do away with the grit and reality of life’s challenges. But we
don’t need to celebrate it, either.
How can we expect our young people to
understand the very real pain and consequences of these acts when they are
glorified at every turn? When death is a regular occurrence on TV and movie
screens, is it any surprise that people are desensitized to it? Or that they
view mass murders as a living video game, just as I view driving in Manhattan
like a real-life video game?
Is it any surprise that young women don’t
honor their bodies when they are flaunted and exploited on social media and
television and in the movies?
Dear Hollywood, Please get out of your glass
house, realize your hypocrisy and do something. You seem to have a grand desire
to make a difference…so go do it. Explore the emotional challenges of aging in
a society or industry that celebrates youth, but let the character actually
develop in some way. Sure, that’s not always the case in real life. Drug
addicts don’t always get better. But Hollywood is not reality, and it is your
privilege to be able to craft and tell the story however you choose and to be
able to help people see the options that exist.
Choose inspiration. Choose shining a light on
pathways of progress. And yes…continue to provoke and explore the dark
underside of life that sadly exists and needs to be talked about. Display
it…yes. But you don’t need to celebrate it.
The End.
Sarah Hiner, president and CEO of Bottom Line Inc., is passionate about giving people the tools and knowledge they need to be in control of their lives in areas such as living a healthier life, the challenges of the health-care system, commonsense financial advice and creating great relationships. She appears often on national radio and hosts the Bottom Line Advocator Podcast, where she interviews leading experts to help people be their own best advocates in all areas of life.